Open & Affirming
a 1st century church for the 21st century

Home ] Mission ] Jubilee ] Agape Meal ] Art ] [ Open & Affirming ] Environment ] Schedule ]

Religion & Homosexuality Links

The Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies in Religion and Ministry

The United Church of Christ Coalition for LGBT Concerns

Soulforce

Integrity USA

Dignity USA

gaychurch.org

Metropolitan Community Churches

Gay Buddhist Fellowship

Queer Muslims Homepage

Shower of Stoles Project

More Light Presbyterians

Lutherans Concerned
North America

World Congress of
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and
Transgender Jews

Affirmation:
United Methodists for
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered Concerns

 

At Amistad we value diversity and are Open & Affirming
of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Persons in all areas of our church life and ministry.

click here to read our Letter to the Editor about Prop. 8

The following exchange took place on the editorial pages (print and online) of 
The Reporter

and is © Copyright, The Reporter, Vacaville, California, 95688.

"More to it than reproduction"
June 2, 2007

Reporter Editor:


One of your letter writers ("Legislation can't change nature," The Reporter, April 21) notes that male and female reproductive organs fit together and are able to reproduce. I myself have noted this same fact. 

But the fit of female and male genitalia does not lead me to conclude, as she does, that nature only smiles on heterosexual relationships, marriages and families.

Reproduction is not the only value that matters when it comes to blessing marriages and celebrating families.
The Hebrew Bible notes that God created humankind in the divine image, male and female, and blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it" (Genesis 1:27-28a). 

But reproduction run amok threatens our very life on this planet. I believe the still-speaking God has recently said: "Stop! Enough of filling the earth and subduing it. Mission accomplished! Now start taking better care of the Earth and of one another."

If marriage must of necessity lead to a baby carriage, as the old song would suggest, then of course we would never bless or sanction the marriage of couples who choose to remain childless, or to adopt their children; we would never legalize marriage between people past the age of childbearing.

Such a suggestion is offensive. So, too, is the suggestion that same-gender couples are not entitled to the civil rights and privileges of marriage simply because their genitalia don't fit together in a certain way.

Assembly Bill 43 - the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act - is indeed a civil rights issue. I urge your readers to consider it as such.

Marian Conning, Vacaville

The author is pastor of Amistad United Church of Christ in Vacaville.

 

 

Home ] Mission ] Jubilee ] Agape Meal ] Art ] [ Open & Affirming ] Environment ] Schedule ]